In this guide

I like the way Japanese lets us explain how someone else’s actions affected us. Suppose someone eats the piece of cake you’d saved for later. You might want to do more than report what they ate. It was your dessert, and you were looking forward to it.

Now imagine you’d offered them that same piece of cake. They still do the eating, but you’ve given permission instead of losing something you wanted. That difference matters when you choose how to tell the story in Japanese.

The causative form lets you say that someone makes or allows another person to do something. The passive form tells the story from the side of the person or thing receiving an action, or someone affected by it. I find it useful to learn them together because keeping the people’s parts clear helps make sense of both.

In this guide, we’ll build the two forms and use them in small, everyday scenes. You’ll practise choosing the verb and the particles—the small words that show how the people and things fit into a sentence—so the sentence tells the story you intended.

Japanese causative form: “let” or “make”?

A causative says that someone gets another person to act, or allows them to act. Here is a sentence before that extra person is added:

ケンが本(ほん)を読(よ)む。

Ken reads a book.

ケンが tells us who reads. 本(ほん)を tells us what he reads: the book is the object of the action. Now the teacher decides that Ken will read:

先生(せんせい)はケンに本(ほん)を読(よ)ませる。

The teacher lets Ken read a book. / The teacher makes Ken read a book.

The teacher is in charge of the action, but Ken still does the reading. は makes the teacher the topic of the sentence; ケンに names the person the teacher gets to act, and 本(ほん)を is still the book. 読(よ)む has changed to the causative 読(よ)ませる.

Imagine Ken asks to read his favourite book during a quiet activity, and the teacher agrees: “lets Ken read.” If Ken wants to play but the teacher insists on reading, “makes Ken read” fits. The ending allows both meanings. What the people want and what is agreed or demanded tell you which translation to use.

Try it

Which meaning fits?

Ken asks to read his favourite book during a quiet activity. The teacher agrees.

先生(せんせい)はケンに本(ほん)を読(よ)ませる。

Choose one answer.

Build a causative, one verb group at a time

Start with the dictionary form, such as 読(よ)む or 食(た)べる. A dictionary’s group label tells you how to change it: group 1 (godan), group 2 (ichidan), or irregular. Check that label for an unfamiliar verb. Ending in る is not enough to make a verb group 2: 帰(かえ)る and 走(はし)る are group 1.

Group 1: change the last kana, then add せる

Move the last kana to its matching a sound and add せる. For 読(よ)む, む becomes ま, giving 読(よ)ませる. Use the table to find the change for the verb you need. Final う is the special spelling: it becomes わ, so 買(か)う becomes 買(か)わせる.

Group 1 causative changes
Last kanaChange toDictionary → causative
うわ買(か)う → 買(か)わせる (buy)
くか書(か)く → 書(か)かせる (write)
ぐが泳(およ)ぐ → 泳(およ)がせる (swim)
すさ話(はな)す → 話(はな)させる (speak)
つた立(た)つ → 立(た)たせる (stand)
ぬな死(し)ぬ → 死(し)なせる (die)
ぶば呼(よ)ぶ → 呼(よ)ばせる (call)
むま読(よ)む → 読(よ)ませる (read)
るら帰(かえ)る → 帰(かえ)らせる (go home)
Try it

The final-う change

Yumi lets Ken buy bread. Complete the plain nonpast causative of 買(か)う (buy, group 1). Use the full form ending in せる taught here.

ユミはケンにパンを_。

Fill in the blank, then check your answer.

Group 2: replace る with させる

Remove the final る and add させる. 食(た)べる becomes 食(た)べさせる, “let or make someone eat.” 見(み)る becomes 見(み)させる, “let or make someone see or watch.” The part before the final る stays as it is.

Try it

A group 2 verb

Yumi lets Ken eat some cake. Complete the plain nonpast causative of 食(た)べる (eat, group 2). Use the full form ending in させる taught here.

ユミはケンにケーキを_。

Fill in the blank, then check your answer.

The two irregular changes

Learn する → させる and 来(く)る → 来(こ)させる as whole changes. 来(く)る is read くる, but 来(こ)させる is こさせる. A noun joined to する follows the same change: 勉強(べんきょう)する, “study,” becomes 勉強(べんきょう)させる.

Try it

The irregular change

Write the causative of 来(く)る (come). Use the full form ending in させる taught here, without making it past.

来(く)る → _

Fill in the blank, then check your answer.

To describe a past event, replace the new verb’s final る with た: 読(よ)ませる → 読(よ)ませた, 食(た)べさせる → 食(た)べさせた, and 来(こ)させる → 来(こ)させた. You change the final る after making the causative; the causative ending itself does not mean past.

Choose the particle for the person doing the action

I’d learn the object-taking pattern first because it gives every noun an obvious job. In 車(くるま)を洗(あら)う, “wash a car,” the car is what gets washed. An action that takes an object like this is called transitive.

ユミはケンに車(くるま)を洗(あら)わせた。

Yumi made Ken wash the car.

Yumi told Ken to wash it, although he wanted to stay inside. The car keeps を, and Ken, who washes it, takes に. This is the same arrangement as the teacher, Ken and the book. If Ken had offered and Yumi had agreed, this sentence could mean “Yumi let Ken wash the car” with the same particles.

Try it

Who cleans the classroom?

The teacher tells a student to clean the classroom. 掃除(そうじ)する means “clean”; 教室(きょうしつ) is the classroom being cleaned.

Choose the sentence that keeps those people in their parts.

Choose one answer.

An action without an object

Standing is different: in 学生(がくせい)が立(た)つ, “the student stands,” there is no separate thing the student acts on. 立(た)つ is intransitive. For a strongly imposed action like making a reluctant student stand, mark that person with を:

先生(せんせい)は学生(がくせい)を立(た)たせた。

The teacher made the student stand.

The student stands; the teacher makes it happen. The same basic を pattern also works for permission. At playtime, for example:

先生(せんせい)は子(こ)どもを遊(あそ)ばせた。

The teacher let the children play.

The children want to play and the teacher lets them. With a willing person doing an intransitive action, に is also possible: 先生(せんせい)は子(こ)どもに遊(あそ)ばせた. So を can go with “let,” and に can go with “make,” as in the car sentence. Choose the pattern for the action and its participants; use the scene to understand permission or compulsion.

Try it

Two ways to let them play

It is playtime. The children want to play and the teacher lets them. Select both sentences that fit.

The teacher must allow the action, and the children must play.

Select all that work.

Keep a destination separate from the person

A movement sentence may also name a place. In the next example, Ken goes and 公園(こうえん)に tells us where:

先生(せんせい)はケンを公園(こうえん)に行(い)かせた。

The teacher made/let Ken go to the park.

A path is different from a destination. この道(みち)を歩(ある)く means “walk along this road”; を marks the route. When that route already takes を, give the person walking に:

先生(せんせい)は学生(がくせい)にこの道(みち)を歩(ある)かせた。

The teacher had the students walk along this road.

学生(がくせい)に names the walkers. この道(みち)を names their path. Looking at whether a noun is a person, a destination or a route makes the particles easier to choose.

Try it

Find the people and their route

Yumi has Ken run along this road for practice. 走(はし)る means “run” and is group 1; この道(みち) is the route.

Which sentence keeps the people separate from the path?

Choose one answer.

Let someone use your computer

Yumi allowed Ken to use her computer. Write one plain-past causative sentence with ユミ, ケン, パソコン (computer) and 使(つか)う (use, group 1). Ken must be the person who uses it.

Copy your Japanese text, then paste it into the checker. This writing space does not assess or save your text.

Japanese passive form: tell the receiver’s side

The passive lets you talk about the person or thing receiving an action. Suppose a dog bites Yumi. We can tell the same incident from either side:

犬(いぬ)がユミをかんだ。

A dog bit Yumi.

ユミは犬(いぬ)にかまれた。

Yumi was bitten by a dog.

The dog still bites, and Yumi still receives the bite. In the active sentence, 犬(いぬ)が is the actor and ユミを is the target. In the passive sentence, ユミは makes Yumi the topic, 犬(いぬ)に names the actor, and かまれた is the past passive. The viewpoint changes; the incident stays the same.

This is a useful contrast with the causative. In ユミはケンに車(くるま)を洗(あら)わせた, Ken washes because Yumi gets him to. In ユミは犬(いぬ)にかまれた, the dog bites and Yumi receives it. Read に together with the verb to work out the person’s part.

Build the passive from the same dictionary form

For group 1, use the a-sound changes from the causative table, but add れる instead of せる. 読(よ)む becomes 読(よ)まれる; 買(か)う becomes 買(か)われる. For group 2, remove る and add られる: 食(た)べる becomes 食(た)べられる.

Causative and passive forms from the same base verb
Dictionary formCausativePassive
読(よ)む (group 1)読(よ)ませる読(よ)まれる
食(た)べる (group 2)食(た)べさせる食(た)べられる
する (irregular)させるされる
来(く)る (irregular)来(こ)させる来(こ)られる

来(こ)られる is read こられる. To make a passive past, change its final る to た, just as you did with the causative: かむ → かまれる → かまれた. For ほめる, “praise,” remove る and add られる, then make it past: ほめられた.

ユミは先生(せんせい)にほめられた。

Yumi was praised by the teacher.

Yumi receives praise here, so the passive is just as useful for a good experience. “Receiver” does not have to mean “victim.”

Try it

Retell from the receiver’s side

The teacher called Yumi over. Start with Yumi and complete the plain past passive of 呼(よ)ぶ (call, group 1).

ユミは先生(せんせい)に_。

Fill in the blank, then check your answer.

The cake was eaten—but I’m the one affected

Now imagine you saved a cake for later, but Ken ate it without asking. The cake is what gets eaten; you are the person left disappointed. Japanese lets you tell that experience with a passive too:

ケンが私(わたし)のケーキを食(た)べた。

Ken ate my cake.

私(わたし)はケンにケーキを食(た)べられた。

Ken ate my cake, and I was upset about it.

I was not eaten. The cake was. 私(わたし)は names the affected person, ケンに names the eater, and ケーキを stays the thing eaten. This is often called an indirect or affected passive: the action affects me through something that matters to me.

I like this use because it explains why the story is being told from my side. It is more than news about Ken’s snack. Natural English may use an active sentence, “Ken ate my cake,” and add the effect on me; the Japanese passive carries that affected viewpoint.

Try it

Tell Yumi’s lunch story

Ken eats Yumi’s sandwich without asking. She had saved it for lunch and is upset.

Choose Yumi’s affected viewpoint.

Choose one answer.

An event itself can cause the trouble

The action need not have a direct object. 雨(あめ)が降(ふ)った simply reports “It rained.” If you were walking home without an umbrella, you can instead tell what happened to you:

私(わたし)は雨(あめ)に降(ふ)られた。

I got caught in the rain.

Rain does not act on an object marked を here. The passive makes you the affected person because the rain inconvenienced you. Use this viewpoint when there is an effect to tell; use 雨(あめ)が降(ふ)った for the weather report on its own.

Try it

Weather or a wet walk?

You are writing a neutral weather note. You want to say “It rained,” without describing anyone getting caught in it.

Choose the straightforward event report.

Choose one answer.

When られる could mean “can”

The potential form expresses ability or possibility: “can eat,” for example. For group 2 verbs, its standard form looks exactly like the passive. So 食(た)べられる can mean “can eat” or “be eaten.” The people and situation help us choose:

私(わたし)はこのパンが食(た)べられる。

I can eat this bread.

You have checked the ingredients and found that the bread is safe for you to eat. You are the possible eater; the bread is what you can eat. Here が marks the bread, as it often marks what you can eat in a potential sentence.

このパンは鳥(とり)に食(た)べられた。

This bread was eaten by birds.

This time, you find that birds have eaten bread left outside. The bread receives the action and 鳥(とり)に tells us who ate it. The same verb has a passive meaning. Neither られる nor が alone can settle every sentence: a passive subject can take が too. If the people and situation are missing, ask for enough context to tell who can act or who is affected.

Try it

Who saw whom?

見(み)る means “see” and is group 2. Yumi was hiding a present, but Ken saw her. She reports:

私(わたし)はケンに見(み)られた。

Choose one answer.

An English passive can describe a simple event

Before turning an English passive into Japanese, decide what you want to report. 開(あ)く means that something opens, while 開(あ)ける means that someone opens it:

ドアが開(あ)いた。

The door opened.

ケンがドアを開(あ)けた。

Ken opened the door.

The first sentence reports an event without naming a cause. The second tells us what Ken did. Either may convey what an English speaker reports as “the door was opened,” depending on what the scene is about.

ドアはケンに開(あ)けられた。

The door was opened by Ken.

The passive can fit when you are discussing the door and identifying who opened it. It gives the door the leading place in the sentence. Choose that viewpoint when it helps your story, rather than because English uses “was opened.”

Try it

Report an opening door

You see a door open. You do not know who or what caused it, and you simply want to report the opening.

Which sentence says what you know?

Choose one answer.

We have kept the people named so their parts stay clear. Japanese can leave them out once the conversation makes them understood—for example, when everyone already knows whose cake was eaten. The listener still needs to be able to follow the same incident.

One follow-up: being made to act

There is a separate construction for “I was made to do it”: the causative-passive. Build the causative first. The new causative follows the group 2 passive rule, whatever the original verb’s group: replace its final る with られる. For 食(た)べる, the steps are 食(た)べる → 食(た)べさせる → 食(た)べさせられる.

私(わたし)は母(はは)に野菜(やさい)を食(た)べさせられた。

I was made to eat vegetables by my mother.

I eat; my mother makes me do it. The sentence tells that imposed action from my side and often suggests I did not want to do it. Compare the simple passive 私(わたし)はケンにケーキを食(た)べられた: there, Ken eats and I lose my cake. In the combined form, I am both the person who has to act and the person whose experience we hear.

Try it

Who has to eat?

The speaker does not want vegetables, but her mother insists. Read the combined form in this scene.

私(わたし)は母(はは)に野菜(やさい)を食(た)べさせられた。

Choose one answer.

Give someone else a turn to tell the story

Here is a new incident: Ken broke Yumi’s cup. We know what Ken did. Now let Yumi tell why it matters to her.

Retell the broken-cup incident

Write one plain-past passive sentence from Yumi’s affected viewpoint. Use ユミ, ケン, コップ (cup) and 壊(こわ)す (break something, group 1). The cup should remain the thing broken. Then explain the particle you chose for Ken.

Copy your Japanese text, then paste it into the checker. This writing space does not assess or save your text.

The writing checker can suggest corrections to your Japanese. Guests can try it within a limited daily writing allowance. Compare a suggestion with the incident you meant: a grammatical sentence can still put the wrong person in charge or make the wrong person act.

About the author

Illustrated avatar of B. Rungswell

B. Rungswell

Editor of the Bunpo Check blog

B. Rungswell is the editor of the Bunpo Check blog and a native English speaker who has passed JLPT N1. Drawing on many years of life in Japan and experience working at Japanese companies, Rungswell writes practical guides to Japanese grammar for English-speaking learners.